From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Durda v. Ion Genius, Inc.

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai‘i.
Feb 15, 2017
389 P.3d 941 (Haw. Ct. App. 2017)

Summary

applying the Blaisdell standard to dismissal where trial court did not identify authority pursuant to which dismissal was entered

Summary of this case from Erum v. Llego

Opinion

NO. CAAP-13-0000420

02-15-2017

Lisa DURDA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ION GENIUS, INC., a Hawai‘i corporation, Defendant-Appellant, and Xanya Sofra-Weiss, John Does 1-10; Jane Does 1-10; Doe Corporations 1-10; Doe Partnerships 1-10; and Doe Entities 1-10, Defendants, and Ion Genius, Inc., a Hawai'i corporation, and Xanya Sofra-Weiss, Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gena Costales, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee

On the briefs: Grant H. Gibson, (G. Gibson & Associates, LLC) for Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, Ion Genius, Inc. and Xanya Sofra-Weiss.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Remand.


Summaries of

Durda v. Ion Genius, Inc.

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai‘i.
Feb 15, 2017
389 P.3d 941 (Haw. Ct. App. 2017)

applying the Blaisdell standard to dismissal where trial court did not identify authority pursuant to which dismissal was entered

Summary of this case from Erum v. Llego
Case details for

Durda v. Ion Genius, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Lisa DURDA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ION GENIUS, INC., a Hawai‘i…

Court:Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai‘i.

Date published: Feb 15, 2017

Citations

389 P.3d 941 (Haw. Ct. App. 2017)

Citing Cases

Nishida v. 3908 Kamoku LLC

He cites to appendices attached to his opening brief, but "[t]his court disregards appendices that are not…

Erum v. Llego

Feb. 17, 2017) (mem.) (applying the Blaisdell standard to a dismissal entered pursuant to HRCP Rule 72 );…