From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dubasso v. Owners

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 2008
51 A.D.3d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 3541.

May 1, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), entered July 12, 2007, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the first, second, and third causes of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Smith, Buss Jacobs, LLP, Yonkers (James R. Anderson of counsel), for appellants.

Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman Herz, LLP, New York (Alan A.B. McDowell of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Lippman, P.J., Gonzalez, Moskowitz and Acosta, JJ.


As the record presents issues of fact whether the challenged actions of defendant cooperative corporation's board of directors were outside the scope of the board's authority and whether they were undertaken in good faith, the court properly declined to conclude as a matter of law that these actions are protected by the business judgment rule (see Matter of Levandusky v One Fifth Ave. Apt. Corp., 75 NY2d 530, 537-540; Barbour v Knecht, 296 AD2d 218, 225).


Summaries of

Dubasso v. Owners

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 2008
51 A.D.3d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Dubasso v. Owners

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL DUBASSO et al., Respondents, v. EAST 69TH OWNERS CORP. et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 1, 2008

Citations

51 A.D.3d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 4124
855 N.Y.S.2d 369

Citing Cases

Summer ex rel. Ruckus 85 Corp. v. Ruckus 85 Corp.

Although Deeton disputes the veracity of plaintiffs' claims, the court cannot decide credibility issues on…