From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Downriver Loan Co. v. Gabbert

Michigan Court of Appeals
Dec 8, 1971
37 Mich. App. 411 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

Docket No. 10656.

Decided December 8, 1971.

Appeal from Wayne, Joseph A. Sullivan, J. Submitted Division 1 November 23, 1971, at Lansing. (Docket No. 10656.) Decided December 8, 1971.

Garnishment proceeding by Downriver Loan Co. against Harry R. Gabbert, Jr., and Nancy Gabbert, principal defendants, and Brender-Hamill Associates, Inc., garnishee defendant. Default judgment against garnishee defendant. Default judgment set aside. Plaintiff filed an appeal of right. Appeal dismissed.

R.G. Corace, P.C. (by Wayne A. Smith), for plaintiff. John R. Ryan, for garnishee defendant.

Before: BRONSON, P.J., and QUINN and DANHOF, JJ.


Plaintiff has filed an appeal of right from an order setting aside a default against the garnishee defendant. Upon our review of the record, it is clear that such an order is interlocutory in nature and therefore may not be the subject of an appeal of right. GCR 1963, 806.1.

On May 6, 1970, plaintiff secured a judgment against the principal defendants. An affidavit for writ of garnishment was filed on July 31, 1970, and the garnishment writ was issued on that date. Garnishee summons was served upon garnishee defendant on August 5, 1970, and garnishee defendant thereafter filed a disclosure of liability to the principal defendants. Plaintiff then entered a default against the garnishee defendant for failure of the garnishee defendant to serve a copy of its disclosure upon plaintiff's attorney; garnishee defendant moved to set aside the default; said motion was granted by the trial court; and plaintiff timely filed a claim of appeal in this Court.

An order setting aside a default is a nonfinal, and hence interlocutory judgment. Quail v. Cole, 260 Mich. 642 (1932). As such, it may be reviewed by this Court only upon the filing of an application for leave to appeal. Conlon v. State Treasurer, 23 Mich. App. 646 (1970). No application for leave to appeal having been filed, this Court can do no more than dismiss the appeal. Fox v. Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, 375 Mich. 238 (1965).

See also, American Eutectic Welding Alloys Sales Co, Inc, v. Grier, 363 Mich. 175 (1961); United Insurance Company of America v. Goldenberg, 366 Mich. 167 (1962); Ordon v. Sarko, 371 Mich. 689 (1963).

The appeal is therefore dismissed. No costs, appellee not having initiated a motion to dismiss pursuant to GCR 1963, 817.5.


Summaries of

Downriver Loan Co. v. Gabbert

Michigan Court of Appeals
Dec 8, 1971
37 Mich. App. 411 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

Downriver Loan Co. v. Gabbert

Case Details

Full title:DOWNRIVER LOAN CO. v. GABBERT

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 8, 1971

Citations

37 Mich. App. 411 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
195 N.W.2d 34

Citing Cases

Guzowski v. Racing Ass'n

Conlon v State Treasurer, 23 Mich. App. 646; 179 N.W.2d 208 (1970). When a party claims an appeal from an…

Hart v. State

Toth, A Critique of the Unpublished P.C. , 58 Mich. B. J. 653 (1979). See, e.g., Solner Inv. Co. v. Thoms , 2…