From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dominguez v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 25, 2013
12-cv-231 (CBA) (LB) (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 25, 2013)

Opinion

12-cv-231 (CBA) (LB)

02-25-2013

PHILIP DOMINGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM R. MILLER, LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY, M.D. CHIRILLO, D.J. HORRELL, MICHAEL BARTO, RICHARD KRASON, GEORGE FARRELL, ARTHUR MARATEA, MICHAEL MCDERMOTT, SCOTT PETRAGLIA, and MARILYN KUSTOFF, Defendant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

AMON, Chief United States District Judge.

Plaintiff Philip Dominguez brings this action for violations of the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 151, et seq. and the United States Constitution against defendants William R. Miller, Long Island Railroad Company ("LIRR"), M.D. Chirillo, D.J. Horrell, Michael Barto, Richard Krason, George Farrell, Arthur Maratea, Michael McDermott, Scott Petraglia, and Marilyn Kustoff (collectively, "defendants"). Defendants move to dismiss under various subsections of Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b). Now before the Court is Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that defendant Krason's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction be denied, but that defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim be granted.

No party has objected to the R&R, and the time for doing so has passed. Where no timely objections have been filed, a district court "need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, Notes of Advisory Committee; Jarvis v. N. Am. Globex Fund, L.P, 823 F.Supp.2d 161, 163 (E.D.N.Y. 2011). The Court has reviewed the record and, finding no clear error in the R&R, hereby adopts it in its entirety as the opinion of the Court.

The Court notes the minor correction that Fong v. Am. Airlines, Inc., cited in footnote 7 of the r&r, is improperly cited as a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision. The proper citation is 431 F. Supp. 1340 (N.D. Cal. 1977).

The amended complaint is dismissed as to all defendants. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: Brooklyn, N.Y.

February 25, 2013

________

Carol Bagley Amon

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Dominguez v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 25, 2013
12-cv-231 (CBA) (LB) (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Dominguez v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:PHILIP DOMINGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM R. MILLER, LONG ISLAND RAILROAD…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Feb 25, 2013

Citations

12-cv-231 (CBA) (LB) (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 25, 2013)