From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dixon v. Dixon

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 4, 1972
61 N.J. 578 (N.J. 1972)

Opinion

Decided December 4, 1972.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Francis J. Dixon, a member of the New York bar, filed a brief pro se. Mr. Robert A. Pennachio filed a brief for respondent ( Messrs. Draesel, Breitenstein Pennachio, attorneys).


There being no appeal as of right in this matter and the Court having considered the filed papers as a petition for certification, the Court will dismiss this matter as presenting no substantial issue.

For dismissal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, Justices JACOBS, HALL and MOUNTAIN, and Judges CONFORD, SULLIVAN and LEWIS — 7.

Opposed — None.


Summaries of

Dixon v. Dixon

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 4, 1972
61 N.J. 578 (N.J. 1972)
Case details for

Dixon v. Dixon

Case Details

Full title:CAROL J. DIXON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. FRANCIS J. DIXON…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Dec 4, 1972

Citations

61 N.J. 578 (N.J. 1972)
297 A.2d 2

Citing Cases

In re Simpkins

Violations of federal tax law are serious ethics breaches. In re Queenan, 61 N.J. 578, 580 (1972). "…

In re Rubin

A violation of federal tax law is a serious ethics breach. In re Queenan, 61 N.J. 578, 580 (1972).…