From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disa Realty, Inc. v. Rao

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 20, 2021
198 A.D.3d 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

2017–09067 Index No. 9880/12

10-20-2021

DISA REALTY, INC., respondent, v. Kishor RAO, etc., appellant, et al., defendants.

Kishor Rao, Ozone Park, NY, appellant pro se.


Kishor Rao, Ozone Park, NY, appellant pro se.

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., ROBERT J. MILLER, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, LARA J. GENOVESI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Kishor Rao appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cheree´ A. Buggs, J.), entered July 18, 2017. The order denied that defendant's motion, inter alia, to dismiss the complaint based upon a violation of Judiciary Law § 487, to strike the note of issue and certificate of readiness, to consolidate the action with an action entitled Disa Realty, Inc. v. Rao , pending in the same court under Index No. 10206/12, and to declare the subject mortgage and note null and void.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the judgment of foreclosure and sale in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248, 383 N.Y.S.2d 285, 347 N.E.2d 647 ). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment of foreclosure and sale ( Disa Realty, Inc. v. Rao, 198 A.D.3d 869, ––– N.Y.S.3d –––– [Appellate Division Docket No. 2019–00439; decided herewith]; see CPLR 5501[a][1] ; Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d at 248, 383 N.Y.S.2d 285, 347 N.E.2d 647 ).

MASTRO, J.P., MILLER, DUFFY and GENOVESI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Disa Realty, Inc. v. Rao

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 20, 2021
198 A.D.3d 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Disa Realty, Inc. v. Rao

Case Details

Full title:DISA REALTY, INC., respondent, v. Kishor RAO, etc., appellant, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 20, 2021

Citations

198 A.D.3d 869 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
152 N.Y.S.3d 827

Citing Cases

Thompson v. Hussain

Where an action is pending in the supreme court it may, upon motion, remove to itself an action pending in…

Frank v. Y. Mommy Taxi, Inc.

Com, Inc. v Internet Data Stor. & Sys., Inc., 51 A.D.3d 839). Where common questions of law or fact exist, a…