Dillon v. State

Full title: DARRIN C. DILLON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 26, 2003

841 So. 2d 579 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 2D02-4092.

Opinion filed March 26, 2003.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Mark I. Shames, Judge.

KELLY, Judge.

Darrin C. Dillon appeals from the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence. Dillon claims that his sentence is illegal under this court's decision in Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla.2d DCA 2002).¹ Dillon's claim is facially insufficient as he does not claim that his date of offense is within the window created by Taylor. We therefore affirm without prejudice to Dillon's filing a facially sufficient 3.800(a) motion.

1 Which held chapter 99-188, Laws of Florida, unconstitutional.

SALCINES and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.