Opinion
Page 655a
102 Cal.App.4th 655a ___Cal.Rptr.2d___ JOE DEOCAMPO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RICHARD S. AHN et al., Defendants and Appellants. B147135 California Court of Appeal, Second District, Third Division September 30, 2002[Modification of opinion (101 Cal.App.4th 758; 125 Cal.Rptr.2d 79) on denial of petition for rehearing.]
This modification requires editorial changes to headnotes 2a-2c, page 759, 7a-7b, page 761, and 11a, 11b, page 763. In the bound volume report, the word "periodicizing" will be changed to "periodizing."
OPINION
THE COURT.
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on August 29, 2002, be modified in the following particular:
Page 2, line 9 [101 Cal.App.4th 766, advance report, 2d par., line 5], change the word "nonperiodicized" to read: nonperiodized
Page 2, line 10 [101 Cal.App.4th 766, advance report, 2d par., line 7], change the word "periodicized" to read: periodized
Page 2 line 16 [101 Cal.App.4th 766, advance report, 2d par., line 14], change the word "periodicized" to read: periodized
Page 7, line 10 [101 Cal.App.4th 769, advance report, 1st par., line 16], change the word "periodicized" to read: periodized
Page 10, footnote 13 [101 Cal.App.4th 771, advance report], change the word "periodicizing" to read: periodizing
Page 12, line 10 [101 Cal.App.4th 772, advance report, 3d par., line 5], change the word "periodicizing" to read: periodizing
Page 17, line 7 [101 Cal.App.4th 775, advance report, 2d par., line 17], change the word "periodicized" to read: periodized
Page 23, line 8 [101 Cal.App.4th 779, advance report, 2d par., line 3], change the word "periodicizing" to read: periodizing
Page 32 [101 Cal.App.4th 785, advance report], delete footnote 22.
Page 655b
The respondents' petition for rehearing is denied.
There is a change in the judgment.