From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Denton v. Bibbs

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 6, 2022
1:19-cv-00316-DAD-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2022)

Opinion

1:19-cv-00316-DAD-EPG (PC)

06-06-2022

RAYMOND H. DENTON, Plaintiff, v. S. BIBBS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE AN UPDATED REPORT RE: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AFTER CLOSE OF NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY (ECF No. 56)

The Court has received Defendants' report indicating that the parties met and conferred via telephone, and that they “agree that a settlement conference would be not be productive at this time, but will reconsider the matter after discovery is closed.” (ECF No. 56, pgs. 1-2). Accordingly, the Court will not set a settlement conference at this time. However, Defendants shall file an updated report regarding whether Defendants want the Court to set a settlement conference no later than fourteen days after the close of non-expert discovery.

If the Court sets a settlement conference, the parties may request an extension of any remaining deadlines.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Denton v. Bibbs

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 6, 2022
1:19-cv-00316-DAD-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Denton v. Bibbs

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND H. DENTON, Plaintiff, v. S. BIBBS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 6, 2022

Citations

1:19-cv-00316-DAD-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2022)