From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deleon v. State

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Sep 9, 2011
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-418 (S.C. Ct. App. Sep. 9, 2011)

Opinion

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-418

09-09-2011

Fredy DeLeon, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Tricia A. Blanchette, of Columbia, for Petitioner. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Daniel E. Grigg, all of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Edgefield County

William P. Keesley, Trial Judge

R. Knox McMahon, Post-Conviction Relief Judge


AFFIRMED

Tricia A. Blanchette, of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Daniel E. Grigg, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : Pursuant to Davis v. State, 288 S.C. 290, 342 S.E.2d 60 (1986) and White v. State, 263 S.C. 110, 208 S.E.2d 35 (1974), by order filed November 1, 2010, this court granted certiorari and a belated direct appeal.

On appeal, DeLeon asserts the trial court erred in refusing to grant a new trial based on an allegation of juror misconduct due to an external influence. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: State v. Zeigler, 364 S.C. 94, 108, 610 S.E.2d 859, 866 (Ct. App. 2005) ("On appeal, the denial of a new trial motion will be disturbed only upon a showing of an abuse of discretion."); id. ("A denial of a new trial based on alleged jury misconduct is reviewed for an abuse of discretion."); id. ("The trial court has broad discretion in assessing allegations of juror misconduct."); id. ("Unless the misconduct affects the jury's impartiality, it is not such misconduct as will affect the verdict.").

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

AFFIRMED.

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Deleon v. State

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Sep 9, 2011
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-418 (S.C. Ct. App. Sep. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Deleon v. State

Case Details

Full title:Fredy DeLeon, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Court:THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 9, 2011

Citations

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-418 (S.C. Ct. App. Sep. 9, 2011)

Citing Cases

DeLeon v. State

The Court of Appeals granted DeLeon's petition for a writ of certiorari, and affirmed his conviction and…

Deleon v. State

The parties agreed to the entry of a consent order of dismissal, which found DeLeon was entitled to petition…