From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deborah Bush v. Division of Human Rights

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 2010
78 A.D.3d 505 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 3605.

November 16, 2010.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John A. Barone, J.), entered on or about February 4, 2009, which denied petitioner's application to annul the determination of respondent New York State Division of Human Rights finding no probable cause to believe that respondent housing complex had discriminated against petitioner by denying her application for an apartment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Deborah Bush, appellant pro se.

Law Offices of Arnold N. Kriss, New York (John C. Theodorellis of counsel), for Stevenson Commons Associates, L.P., respondent.

Before: Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Catterson, Renwick and Román, JJ.


The record shows that the Division conducted an appropriate and fair investigation, and that it had a rational basis for finding no probable cause to believe that petitioner's housing application was rejected because of her race, sex, marital status, religion, or disability ( see Matter of McFarland v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 241 AD2d 108, 111-112; see also Gaskin v Westbourne Assoc. L.P., 59 AD3d 362). Petitioner's other requests for relief are not properly before this Court.


Summaries of

Deborah Bush v. Division of Human Rights

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 2010
78 A.D.3d 505 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Deborah Bush v. Division of Human Rights

Case Details

Full title:DEBORAH BUSH, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, Respondent, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 16, 2010

Citations

78 A.D.3d 505 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 8369
910 N.Y.S.2d 645

Citing Cases

Watterson v. for a Judgement Pursuant to the Provisions of Article 78 of the N.Y. Civil Practice Law

DHR considered all of the petitioner's submissions and after a thorough investigation concluded that there…

In re Deborah Bush

Decided June 30, 2011. Reported below, 78 AD3d 505. Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely ( see…