From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gaskin v. Westbourne Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 26, 2009
59 A.D.3d 362 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 5375.

February 26, 2009.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy S. Friedman, J.), entered February 13, 2008, which dismissed the petition seeking to annul the determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Carolyn R. Gaskin, appellant pro se.

Kellner Herlihy Getty Friedman, LLP, New York (Jeanne-Marie Williams of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Nardelli, Buckley and DeGrasse, JJ.


The petition challenging the Division's finding that there was no probable cause to support her claims that respondent Westbourne Associates, L.P. engaged in unlawful discriminatory practices related to housing based on petitioner's race/color, creed or sex ( see Executive Law § 296 [a] [2]) was properly dismissed for failure to allege facts sufficient to show that the Division's determination was arbitrary and capricious ( see Matter of McFarland v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 241 AD2d 108).

Petitioner's remaining arguments are unavailing.


Summaries of

Gaskin v. Westbourne Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 26, 2009
59 A.D.3d 362 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Gaskin v. Westbourne Assoc

Case Details

Full title:CAROLYN R. GASKIN, Appellant, v. WESTBOURNE ASSOCIATES, L.P., Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 26, 2009

Citations

59 A.D.3d 362 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 1421
873 N.Y.S.2d 307

Citing Cases

In re Rullan v. N.Y.C. Dep. of Sani.

A petition alleging discriminatory practices is "properly dismissed" if it fails "to allege facts sufficient…

In re Ronnie Allen

Before: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sweeny, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ. The challenged determination that there…