From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dawson v. Lynch

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 6, 2022
2:21-cv-0510 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0510 KJM AC P

10-06-2022

CARLOS MANWELL DAWSON, Plaintiff, v. JEFF LYNCH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

By order filed August 19, 2022, the complaint was screened and found to not state a claim for relief. ECF No. 22. Plaintiff was given thirty days to file an amended complaint and cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 10. Thirty days have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. Plaintiff will be given one final opportunity to file an amended complaint.

Plaintiff sought an extension of time to file objections to the findings and recommendations that accompanied the order, but that motion did not include a request to extend the time to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 25. The pending recommendations involve motions for preliminary injunctive relief, and do not affect the status of case screening.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within twenty-one days of the service of this order. Failure to do so will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without further warning.


Summaries of

Dawson v. Lynch

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 6, 2022
2:21-cv-0510 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Dawson v. Lynch

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS MANWELL DAWSON, Plaintiff, v. JEFF LYNCH, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 6, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-0510 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2022)