From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Speth

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 12, 2021
1:19-cv-1032-NE-HBK (E.D. Cal. Jul. 12, 2021)

Opinion

1:19-cv-1032-NE-HBK

07-12-2021

KENNETH DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. S. SPETH, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

(DOC. NO. 29)

Plaintiff Kenneth Davis initiated this action as a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis by filing a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 12, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations granting defendant's motion to dismiss due to plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address, ultimately recommending dismissal for failure to prosecute. (Doc. No. 29 at 1-5.) The findings and recommendations served on plaintiff contained notice that objections were due within fourteen days. (Id. at 5.) Plaintiff did not file any objections. (See docket). Instead, the May 12, 2021 order was returned to the court as undeliverable due to plaintiff not keeping the court apprised of his address. (Id.)

Prior to the issuance of findings and recommendations, earlier court orders (Doc. Nos. 23, 25, 26) were served on plaintiff but were returned as undeliverable in August and September of 2020. (See docket.) According to Local Rule 183(b), plaintiff had sixty-three (63) days to update his address. He failed to do so.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

ACCORDINGLY, it is ORDERED:

1. The findings and recommendations, filed on May 12, 2021, (Doc. No. 29), are adopted in full;

2. The Clerk of Court shall assign a district judge to this matter for the purposes of closure, terminate any pending motions, close this case, and enter judgment against plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Davis v. Speth

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 12, 2021
1:19-cv-1032-NE-HBK (E.D. Cal. Jul. 12, 2021)
Case details for

Davis v. Speth

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. S. SPETH, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 12, 2021

Citations

1:19-cv-1032-NE-HBK (E.D. Cal. Jul. 12, 2021)