From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Hardesty

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Jan 26, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv11-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jan. 26, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv11-MHT (WO)

01-26-2015

SADAKA DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. RHONDA JONES HARDESTY, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered on this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows:

(1) Plaintiff's objections (doc. no. 9) are overruled.

(2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 7) is adopted.

(3) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

DONE, this the 26th day of January, 2015.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Davis v. Hardesty

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Jan 26, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv11-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jan. 26, 2015)
Case details for

Davis v. Hardesty

Case Details

Full title:SADAKA DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. RHONDA JONES HARDESTY, Defendant.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 26, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv11-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jan. 26, 2015)

Citing Cases

Phillips v. Scully

. Cf. Davis v. Hardesty, 2015 WL 404308, at *2 (M.D. Ala. Jan. 26, 2015) (finding that the district…