From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DARK v. MacDONALD

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Nov 21, 2005
Civil No. 03-3122-CO (D. Or. Nov. 21, 2005)

Opinion

Civil No. 03-3122-CO.

November 21, 2005


ORDER


Magistrate Judge John P. Cooney filed his Findings and Recommendation on October 17, 2005. The matter is now before me.See 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72 (b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review.Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principlesde novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Judge Cooney's Findings and Recommendation. Defendants Lake County, McDonald, and Wilkie's motion for summary judgment is granted, and defendants' alternative motion to dismiss defendant Wilkie (#35) is granted, and these defendants are dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

DARK v. MacDONALD

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Nov 21, 2005
Civil No. 03-3122-CO (D. Or. Nov. 21, 2005)
Case details for

DARK v. MacDONALD

Case Details

Full title:JUDY DARK, Personal Representative of Estate of Thomas E. Dark, deceased…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Nov 21, 2005

Citations

Civil No. 03-3122-CO (D. Or. Nov. 21, 2005)

Citing Cases

Chouinard v. Grape Expectations, Incorporated

" Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f). "A motion to strike may be used to strike the prayer for relief where the relief sought…