From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jul 21, 2005
No. 02-05-160-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 21, 2005)

Opinion

No. 02-05-160-CV

Delivered: July 21, 2005.

Appeal From County Court at Law No. 1 of Tarrant County.

Panel D: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


On June 27, 2005, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that payment arrangements had not been made to pay for the record as required by TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(a)(2). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, by July 7, 2005, appellant made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

Daniels v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jul 21, 2005
No. 02-05-160-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 21, 2005)
Case details for

Daniels v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

Case Details

Full title:CAROLYN DANIELS, Appellant, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK AS TRUSTEE AND…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Jul 21, 2005

Citations

No. 02-05-160-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 21, 2005)