From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

D. D. v. L.A. Unified Sch. Dist.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 6, 2021
995 F.3d 670 (9th Cir. 2021)

Opinion

No. 19-55810

05-06-2021

D. D., a minor, BY AND THROUGH his Guardian Ad Litem, Michaela INGRAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee.


ORDER

:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.


Summaries of

D. D. v. L.A. Unified Sch. Dist.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 6, 2021
995 F.3d 670 (9th Cir. 2021)
Case details for

D. D. v. L.A. Unified Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:D. D., a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Michaela Ingram…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 6, 2021

Citations

995 F.3d 670 (9th Cir. 2021)

Citing Cases

Rice v. Governing Auth. of the Bio-Med Sci. Acad.

First and foremost, the decision has been vacated and, therefore, it provides no authority, persuasive or…

E.G. v. Castro Valley Unified Sch. Dist.

Despite E.G.'s reliance on Albino in his opposition to judgment in the pleadings, CVUSD simply ignores that…