From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cranpark v. Cedarapids

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Aug 21, 2007
232 F. App'x 560 (6th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-4233.

August 21, 2007.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.

Before: KEITH, GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges; and VAN TATENHOVE, District Judge.

The Honorable Gregory F. Van Tatenhove, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.


Plaintiff, Cranpark, Inc. ("Cranpark"), sued Defendant, Cedarapids, Inc. ("Cedarapids"), in the Northern District of Ohio, alleging (1) breach of contract, (2) breach of express warranties, (3) breach of the implied warranties of merchantability and of fitness for a particular purpose, (4) breach of duty to repair, (5) misrepresentation, and (6) fraud. Concluding that Cranpark's claims are barred under the parties' contractual agreement and the economic loss doctrine, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of Cedarapids. Cranpark now appeals.

Because the reasons supporting summary judgment in favor of Cedarapids have been well articulated by the district court's thoughtful opinion, a detailed written opinion by this Court would serve no valuable purpose. Therefore, we AFFIRM the district court's grant of summary judgment on the basis of its written opinion.


Summaries of

Cranpark v. Cedarapids

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Aug 21, 2007
232 F. App'x 560 (6th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Cranpark v. Cedarapids

Case Details

Full title:CRANPARK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CEDARAPIDS, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Aug 21, 2007

Citations

232 F. App'x 560 (6th Cir. 2007)