Counterman v. Sage

Full title: JAMES COUNTERMAN, Petitioner, v. WARDEN SAGE, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 14, 2022

CIVIL 1:22-cv-0592 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 14, 2022)

Opinion

CIVIL 1:22-cv-0592

12-14-2022

JAMES COUNTERMAN, Petitioner, v. WARDEN SAGE, Respondent.

Sylvia H. Rambo United States District Judge

ORDER

Sylvia H. Rambo United States District Judge

AND NOW, this 14^th day of December, 2022, upon consideration of Magistrate Judge Martin J. Carlson's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21) in which he recommends that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 be dismissed as moot because the petitioner is no longer in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, and noting that no objections to the report and recommendation have been filed, and the court having satisfied itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record, Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), advisory committee notes; see also Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Intern., Inc., 702 F.Supp.2d 465, 469 (M.D. Pa. 2010) (explaining that judges should review dispositive legal issues raised by the report for clear error), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1) The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED;

2) The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED AS MOOT; and

3) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this file.