From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coulibaly v. Millennium Super Car Wash, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 13, 2013
12-CV-04760 (CBA) (CLP) (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 13, 2013)

Summary

holding that, where plaintiff worked "ten hours a day, six days a week," but worked for twelve hours on only one of these days, "for the duration of his employment, plaintiff worked one day per week in excess of ten hours per day, for a total of 28 days at the applicable minimum wage of $7.15 per hour and 149 days at $7.25 per hour" and was accordingly awarded spread-of-hours wages for only one day a week

Summary of this case from Bedasie v. Mr. Z Towing, Inc.

Opinion

12-CV-04760 (CBA) (CLP)

11-13-2013

ADAM COULIBALY, et al., Plaintiff, v. MILLENNIUM SUPER CAR WASH, Inc., Defendant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

AMON, Chief United States District Judge.

On September 24, 2012, plaintiff Adam Coulibaly ("plaintiff") commenced this action against defendant Millennium Super Car Wash, Inc. ("defendant") seeking unpaid wages, liquidated damages, and pre and post judgment interest pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201, et seq. and the New York Labor Law, §§ 650, et seq. Defendant failed to answer the complaint and on January 23, 2013, the Clerk of Court noted defendant's default for failure to appear or otherwise defend this action. (DE #7.) Plaintiff subsequently moved, on March 15, 2013, for the entry of default judgment against defendant. (DE #8.) The Court referred the matter to Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak, who issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") on July 9, 2013, recommending that the Court grant plaintiffs motion for default judgment, and calculating plaintiffs damages. (DE # 15.)

Neither party has objected to the R&R, and the time for doing so has passed. When deciding whether to adopt an R&R, a district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). To accept those portions of the R&R to which no timely objection has been made, "a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record." Jarvis v. N. Am. Globex Fund, L.P., 823 F. Supp. 2d 161, 163 (E.D.N.Y. 2011) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The Court has reviewed the record and, finding no clear error, hereby adopts Magistrate Judge Pollak's R&R.

Conclusion

Plaintiff is entitled to $5,665.00 in minimum wage par, $12,163.89 in overtime pay, and an additional $17,828.89 in liquidated damages as a result of defendant's willful failure to pay overtime and minimum wages pursuant to the FLSA. Under New York Labor Law plaintiff is entitled to $2,873.00 in minimum wage pay, $6,316.99 in overtime pay, $1,251.45 in spread of hours pay, $1,663.85 in liquidated damages as a result of defendant's willful failure to pay wages owed, as well as pre-judgment interest that has accrued from September 26, 2010 until the entry of judgment in the amount of $2,945.35. In total, the Court awards plaintiff $50,708.42 plus any post-judgment interest that accrues after final judgment is entered. SO ORDERED. Dated: Brooklyn, New York

November 13, 2013

____________________________

Carol Bagley Amon

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Coulibaly v. Millennium Super Car Wash, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 13, 2013
12-CV-04760 (CBA) (CLP) (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 13, 2013)

holding that, where plaintiff worked "ten hours a day, six days a week," but worked for twelve hours on only one of these days, "for the duration of his employment, plaintiff worked one day per week in excess of ten hours per day, for a total of 28 days at the applicable minimum wage of $7.15 per hour and 149 days at $7.25 per hour" and was accordingly awarded spread-of-hours wages for only one day a week

Summary of this case from Bedasie v. Mr. Z Towing, Inc.

holding that the plaintiff failed to establish enterprise coverage for one of the four years it sought to recover lost wages, because it failed to plead that the defendant had $500,000 in gross annual revenue in that particular year, even though he had done so regarding the other years

Summary of this case from Darowski v. Wojewoda

adopting report and recommendation

Summary of this case from Dominguez v. 4 Giron Constr.

adopting report and recommendation

Summary of this case from Sanchez Flores v. EL Bukanitas Inc.

adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation that "one week of pay be deducted from the damages sought by plaintiff. These deductions are intended to account for holidays, sick days, vacation days, and lunch breaks likely taken by plaintiff"

Summary of this case from Bedasie v. Mr. Z Towing, Inc.

denying default judgment in part because "plaintiff has failed to allege that defendant had an annual gross volume of sales equal to or greater than $500,000, as is required by the statute."

Summary of this case from Hamza v. Yandik

using the midpoint of the claims to calculate pre-judgment interest

Summary of this case from Fermin v. Las Delicias Peruanas Rest., Inc.
Case details for

Coulibaly v. Millennium Super Car Wash, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ADAM COULIBALY, et al., Plaintiff, v. MILLENNIUM SUPER CAR WASH, Inc.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 13, 2013

Citations

12-CV-04760 (CBA) (CLP) (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 13, 2013)

Citing Cases

Erdemir v. Allstate Marble & Granite

Coulibaly v. Millennium Super Car Wash, Inc., 12-cv-04760 (CBA)(CLP), 2013 WL 6021668 (E.D.N.Y.…

Diaz v. Rene French Cleaners, Inc.

Courts “resolve the inconsistencies in favor of the defendant.” Coulibaly v. Millennium Super Car Wash, Inc.,…