From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Couey v. Burkhalter

Supreme Court of Georgia.
Mar 4, 2013
739 S.E.2d 389 (Ga. 2013)

Opinion

No. S13A0170.

2013-03-4

COUEY et al. v. BURKHALTER et al.

Samuel Jeffrey Rusbridge, Alicia Michele Argo, Dyer & Rusbridge, P.C., Canton, GA, for Appellant. Terri B. Pierce, Burkhalter & Burkhalter, Bryan Thomas Johnson, Cox, Byington, Corwin, and Twyman, Rome, GA, for Appellee.


Samuel Jeffrey Rusbridge, Alicia Michele Argo, Dyer & Rusbridge, P.C., Canton, GA, for Appellant. Terri B. Pierce, Burkhalter & Burkhalter, Bryan Thomas Johnson, Cox, Byington, Corwin, and Twyman, Rome, GA, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed without opinion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 59.

Appellee Burkhalter's motion for frivolous appeal penalty is hereby denied.

Affirmed without opinion.

All the Justices concur, except BLACKWELL, J., not participating.




Summaries of

Couey v. Burkhalter

Supreme Court of Georgia.
Mar 4, 2013
739 S.E.2d 389 (Ga. 2013)
Case details for

Couey v. Burkhalter

Case Details

Full title:COUEY et al. v. BURKHALTER et al.

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia.

Date published: Mar 4, 2013

Citations

739 S.E.2d 389 (Ga. 2013)