From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coronel v. Biter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 8, 2015
Case No. EDCV 12-974-SVW (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 8, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 12-974-SVW (LAL)

10-08-2015

JAIME CESAR CORONEL, Petitioner, v. M.D. BITER, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination.

Petitioner did not file Objections challenging the analysis set forth in the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;

2. Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice; and

3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.

Additionally, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Thus, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. DATED: October 8, 2015

/s/_________

HONORABLE STEPHEN V. WILSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

See 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 154 L. Ed. 2d 931 (2003).


Summaries of

Coronel v. Biter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 8, 2015
Case No. EDCV 12-974-SVW (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 8, 2015)
Case details for

Coronel v. Biter

Case Details

Full title:JAIME CESAR CORONEL, Petitioner, v. M.D. BITER, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 8, 2015

Citations

Case No. EDCV 12-974-SVW (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 8, 2015)