From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cornejo v. Covello

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 29, 2022
2:20-cv-01124-KJM-DMC (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-01124-KJM-DMC

11-29-2022

Adam Cornejo, Petitioner, v. Patrick Covello, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner Adam Cornejo moves to proceed in forma pauperis in his recently filed appeal. See Mot., ECF No. 17; Not. of Appeal, CF No. 16. “[A] party to a district-court action who desires to appeal in forma pauperis must file a motion in the district court.” Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1). The motion must include “an affidavit that: (A) shows in the detail prescribed by Form 4 of the Appendix of Forms the party's inability to pay or to give security for fees and costs; (B) claims an entitlement to redress; and (C) states the issues that the party intends to present on appeal.” Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1). Cornejo's motion does not attach the required affidavit or fulfill these requirements. It is denied without prejudice to renewal.

https://www.uscourts.gov/rules-policies/current-rules-practice-procedure/appellate-rules-forms

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cornejo v. Covello

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 29, 2022
2:20-cv-01124-KJM-DMC (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Cornejo v. Covello

Case Details

Full title:Adam Cornejo, Petitioner, v. Patrick Covello, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 29, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-01124-KJM-DMC (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2022)