Opinion
9:04-CV-1360 (LEK/RFT).
October 11, 2006
DECISION AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on January 26, 2006, by the Honorable Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 9).
Within ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations," Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. In the interval of at least fifteen days since the Magistrate Judge filed the subject Report-Recommendation, no objections to it have been raised. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.
The Court notes an error, which does not materially impact the content of the Report-Recommendation. The Report-Recommendation cites N.D.N.Y.L.R. 41(a) and (b), while the correct cites should be to N.D.N.Y.L.R. 41.2(a) and (b), respectively. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 9) at 2.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 9) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further
ORDERED, that the case is DISMISSED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.
IT IS SO ORDERED.