From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coppola v. Proulx

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jul 6, 2012
3:11-cv-00074-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Jul. 6, 2012)

Opinion

3:11-cv-00074-LRH-VPC

07-06-2012

RALPH COPPOLA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DARREN K. PROULX, et. al., Defendants.


ORDER

Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke (#91) entered on May 9, 2012, recommending dismissing plaintiff Coppola Enterprises, LLC from this action. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed. The action was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)B and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

Refers to court's docket number.

The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#91) entered on May 9, 2012, should be adopted and accepted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#91) entered on May 9, 2012, is adopted and accepted, and plaintiff Coppola Enterprises, LLC is DISMISSED from this action for failure to file a substitution of counsel and not requesting additional time to do so.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

LARRY R. HICKS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Coppola v. Proulx

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jul 6, 2012
3:11-cv-00074-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Jul. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Coppola v. Proulx

Case Details

Full title:RALPH COPPOLA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DARREN K. PROULX, et. al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jul 6, 2012

Citations

3:11-cv-00074-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Jul. 6, 2012)