From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conway v. the City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 15, 1913
101 N.E. 1099 (N.Y. 1913)

Opinion

Argued March 28, 1913

Decided April 15, 1913

Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel ( Clarence L. Barber and Terence Farley of counsel), for appellant.

Hellmuth Moerchen for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of CLARKE, J., below, on previous appeal. ( 139 App. Div. 446.)

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, WILLARD BARTLETT, CHASE, CUDDEBACK and HOGAN, JJ. Not sitting: MILLER, J.


Summaries of

Conway v. the City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 15, 1913
101 N.E. 1099 (N.Y. 1913)
Case details for

Conway v. the City of New York

Case Details

Full title:HUGH CONWAY, as Administrator of the Estate of THOMAS H. SIM, Deceased…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 15, 1913

Citations

101 N.E. 1099 (N.Y. 1913)
101 N.E. 1099

Citing Cases

Matter of Sellars v. M.V.A.I. Corp.

( Buduson v. Curtis, supra; Joseph v. McVeigh, 285 App. Div. 386, 391; Boffe v. Consolidated Tel. Elec.…

Joseph v. McVeigh

(See, e.g., Crapo v. City of Syracuse, 183 N.Y. 395; Conway v. City of New York, 139 App.Div. 446, affd. 208 …