From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Constantine v. Sperry Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 1989
149 A.D.2d 394 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

April 3, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff James Constantine sustained physical injuries when the van in which he was a passenger struck a curb causing him to fall out of his seat. The van was leased by the plaintiff's employer, Sperry Corporation, for the purpose of transporting its employees to and from work in an effort to lessen the congestion of its parking lot. The van was operated by a fellow employee of the plaintiff, the defendant Oligario. Under these circumstances, the plaintiff's injuries arose out of and in the course of his employment with the defendant Sperry Corporation (see, Matter of Holcomb v. Daily News, 45 N.Y.2d 602). Therefore, the plaintiff's sole remedy is the one provided by the Workers' Compensation Law (see, Workers' Compensation Law § 29). Since both the plaintiff's employer and co-worker are immune from suit, there can be no liability imputed to Gelco Corporation, the owner of the van (see, Heritage v. Van Patten, 59 N.Y.2d 1017, 1019; Ulysse v. Nelsk Taxi, 135 A.D.2d 528, 530). In light of the fact that the primary cause of action must fall, the derivative cause of action by the plaintiff's wife must also be dismissed (see, Eagleston v. Mt. Sinai Med. Center, 144 A.D.2d 427). Mangano, J.P., Kooper, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Constantine v. Sperry Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 1989
149 A.D.2d 394 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Constantine v. Sperry Corporation

Case Details

Full title:JAMES M. CONSTANTINE et al., Appellants, v. SPERRY CORPORATION et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 3, 1989

Citations

149 A.D.2d 394 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
539 N.Y.S.2d 499

Citing Cases

Stoves v. Courier Car Rental, Inc.

Hence, the court recognized that the employer had taken responsibility "for the inherent risks of…

Yue Liang Wang v. Qiang Lin

Here, the plaintiff's deposition testimony, which was taken after the summary judgment motion was made,…