From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Consiglio v. Ahlin

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Feb 22, 2021
No. 19-17496 (9th Cir. Feb. 22, 2021)

Opinion

No. 19-17496

02-22-2021

SAM CONSIGLIO, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PAMELA AHLIN; BRANDON PRICE, Defendants-Appellees, and EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Defendant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 1:16-cv-01268-AWI-SAB MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding Before: FERNANDEZ, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

California civil detainee Sam Consiglio, Jr. appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

Consiglio failed to include any argument in his opening brief regarding the district court's dismissal of his action as untimely under the applicable statute of limitations, and thus has waived any challenge to that issue. See McKay v. Ingleson, 558 F.3d 888, 891 n.5 (9th Cir. 2009) (arguments not raised in an appellant's opening brief are waived).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Consiglio v. Ahlin

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Feb 22, 2021
No. 19-17496 (9th Cir. Feb. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Consiglio v. Ahlin

Case Details

Full title:SAM CONSIGLIO, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PAMELA AHLIN; BRANDON PRICE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 22, 2021

Citations

No. 19-17496 (9th Cir. Feb. 22, 2021)

Citing Cases

Grzyb-Lopez v. Fraser

Futility is also found when the amended complaint would, on its face, be subject to dismissal based on the…