From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commissioners of the St. Ins. Fund v. Bay Bros Realty

Supreme Court, New York County
Oct 4, 1961
29 Misc. 2d 670 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1961)

Opinion

October 4, 1961

Charles G. Tierney ( Harry Schechter and Henry Katz of counsel), for plaintiff.

Tropp Steinbock ( Sidney Goldfinger of counsel), for Bay Bros. Realty Corp., defendant.

James A. Doherty ( Gerard E. Delaney of counsel), for George Hoffman Sons, Inc., defendant.


Motion by plaintiff, Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund, for a preference pursuant to subdivision 1 of rule 151 of the Rules of Civil Practice is granted ( Commissioners State Ins. Fund v. Statland, 181 Misc. 117). The court is not persuaded by the argument advanced by the defendant, George Hoffman Sons, Inc., that the State Insurance Fund has lost its identity as a board of officers of the State and has consequently lost its right to a preference ( Skakandy v. State of New York, 274 App. Div. 153). The motion by defendant, Bay Bros. Realty Corporation, to strike the action from the calendar has been disposed of simultaneously herewith ( 29 Misc.2d 669). The cause is placed on the Personal Non-jury Jury Day Calendar for November 13, 1961.


Summaries of

Commissioners of the St. Ins. Fund v. Bay Bros Realty

Supreme Court, New York County
Oct 4, 1961
29 Misc. 2d 670 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1961)
Case details for

Commissioners of the St. Ins. Fund v. Bay Bros Realty

Case Details

Full title:COMMISSIONERS OF THE STATE INSURANCE FUND et al., Plaintiffs, v. BAY BROS…

Court:Supreme Court, New York County

Date published: Oct 4, 1961

Citations

29 Misc. 2d 670 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1961)
221 N.Y.S.2d 131

Citing Cases

Dormitory Auth. v. Gruzen

Few cases exist where a preference has been granted to a board of officers of the State. The Commissioners of…