Opinion
22-1288
12-22-2022
TRACEY DIANE COLQUITT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BON SECOURS MERCY HEALTH, d/b/a St. Francis Nursing Center; DOMINQUE HAWKINS; TAMIKA GREENE; BRIELLE ROBERSON; ST. FRANCIS NURSING CENTER, Defendants - Appellees, and IRVIN LAND, Defendant.
Tracey Diane Colquitt, Appellant Pro Se. Laura May Hooe, Kathleen Mary McCauley, MORAN, REEVES &CONN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: December 20, 2022
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Roderick Charles Young, District Judge. (4:21-cv-00053-RCY-RJK)
Tracey Diane Colquitt, Appellant Pro Se.
Laura May Hooe, Kathleen Mary McCauley, MORAN, REEVES &CONN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Tracey Diane Colquitt appeals the district court's order dismissing her second amended complaint alleging retaliation, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213 ("ADA"), and Virginia Code § 40.1-27.3; and failure to accommodate her disability, in violation of the ADA. Confining our review to the issues raised in the informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) ("The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief."), we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Colquitt's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court's judgment. Colquitt v. Bon Secours Mercy Health, No. 4:21-cv-00053-RCY-RJK (E.D. Va. Feb. 16, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED