Summary
In Cohoes Hous. Auth. v. Ippolito-Lutz, Inc. (49 N.Y.2d 961, affg 65 A.D.2d 666 for reasons stated below), we, like the Appellate Division, rejected the argument that a party could forestall the commencement of the statutory six-month period merely by continuing to pursue discretionary appellate review.
Summary of this case from Lehman Brothers, Inc. v. Hughes Hubbard ReedOpinion
Argued March 26, 1980
Decided April 24, 1980
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, JOHN H. PENNOCK, J.
Thomas Dussault for appellant.
Jerrold Morgulas for respondent.
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 65 A.D.2d 666).
Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.