From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clemente v. Ide

New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
Feb 1, 2024
205 N.Y.S.3d 227 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)

Opinion

02-01-2024

In the MATTER OF the FRANK A. CLEMENTE TWO–YEAR GRANTOR RETAINED ANNUITY TRUST. Frank Clemente Jr., as Successor Trustee of the Frank A. Clemente Two–Year Grantor Retained Annuity Trust, Respondent; v. Geri Lee Ide et al., Respondents, and Paul Clemente, Appellant.

Mandel Clemente, PC, East Greenbush (Linda A. Mandel Clemente of counsel), for appellant. Tabner, Ryan & Keniry, LLP, Albany (Eric N. Dratler of counsel), for Geri Lee Ide, respondent. Hinman Straub PC, Albany (David B. Morgen of counsel), for Robert Clemente, respondent.


Mandel Clemente, PC, East Greenbush (Linda A. Mandel Clemente of counsel), for appellant.

Tabner, Ryan & Keniry, LLP, Albany (Eric N. Dratler of counsel), for Geri Lee Ide, respondent.

Hinman Straub PC, Albany (David B. Morgen of counsel), for Robert Clemente, respondent.

Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Pritzker, Ceresia, Fisher and Powers, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Ceresia, J.

Appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court of Rensselaer County (Paul V. Morgan Jr., S.), entered March 7, 2022, which denied respondent Geri Lee Ide’s motion to dismiss a citation.

In 2016, Frank A Clemente died, leaving assets in several trusts, including the trust at issue in this case. The beneficiaries of this trust were Frank A. Clemente’s five adult children, including the trustee, David P. Clemente (hereinafter the trustee). After the trustee filed a petition for judicial settlement of his final accounting of the trust, two beneficiaries, Paul Clemente and Robert Clemente, filed objections and sought, among other things, surcharges against the trustee as well as his removal. The matter was eventually scheduled for trial on several unresolved factual issues hut, shortly before trial, the trustee died. Surrogate’s Court then, in an effort to ensure that it had jurisdiction over all interested persons, ordered Paul Clemente to provide information necessary for the court to issue citations to the trustee’s estate or, if none, to the trustee’s presumptive distributees. Paul Clemente submitted a proposed citation for Geri Lee Ide, the trustee’s widow and presumptive distributee, and the court issued it via first-class mail. Ide’s counsel then filed a verified answer with objections to the court’s jurisdiction over Ide and to the continuance of the proceedings without substitution of a proper party for the trustee. At a subsequent court appearance, the court treated the objections as a motion to dismiss the petition and denied it in its entirety. Paul Clemente appeals.

[1–3] The right to appeal from an interlocutory order – such as the one sought to be reviewed herein – terminates upon entry of a final judgment (see Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248, 383 N.Y.S.2d 285, 347 N.E.2d 647 [1976]; Matter of Cotazino v. New York State Adirondack Park Agency, 214 A.D.3d 1137, 1140, 186 N.Y.S.3d 697 [3d Dept. 2023]). During the pendency of this appeal, the parties entered into a stipulation of settlement on the record in open court. Surrogate’s Court thereafter issued a final decree of judicial settlement of the trustee’s accounting, attached to which was a transcript of the parties’ stipulation. Accordingly, this appeal must be dismissed.

It is noted that Paul Clemente has filed a notice of appeal from the final decree, which has not yet been perfected. The appeal from that final decree will bring up for review "any non-final judgment or order which necessarily affects the final judgment" (CPLR 5501[a][1]), including a ruling on jurisdictional matters (see e.g. Federal Natl Mtge. Assn. v. Smith, 219 A.D.3d 938, 940, 195 N.Y.S.3d 704 [2d Dept. 2023]; Matter of Joseph II. v. Brandy JJ., 210 A.D.3d 1315, 1317, n 2, 179 N.Y.S.3d 382 [3d Dept. 2022]; Matter of Gesmer v. Administrative Bd. of the N.Y. State Unified Ct. Sys., 194 A.D.3d 180, 184 n 4, 145 N.Y.S.3d 145 [3d Dept. 2021], appeal dismissed 37 N.Y.3d 1103, 157 N.Y.S.3d 405, 178 N.E.3d 1284 [2021]).

Egan Jr., J.P., Pritzker, Fisher and Powers, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.


Summaries of

Clemente v. Ide

New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
Feb 1, 2024
205 N.Y.S.3d 227 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)
Case details for

Clemente v. Ide

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF the FRANK A. CLEMENTE TWO–YEAR GRANTOR RETAINED ANNUITY…

Court:New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Date published: Feb 1, 2024

Citations

205 N.Y.S.3d 227 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)

Citing Cases

In re SRC Fam. Tr.

Following a subsequent trial, Surrogate’s Court entered a final decree (denominated order) dated December 13,…