From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cleckler v. McNeil

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Mar 16, 2009
Case No. 3:07cv283/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Mar. 16, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 3:07cv283/MCR/EMT.

March 16, 2009


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated January 22, 2009 (Doc. 24). The parties have been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cleckler v. McNeil

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Mar 16, 2009
Case No. 3:07cv283/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Mar. 16, 2009)
Case details for

Cleckler v. McNeil

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN E. CLECKLER, Petitioner, v. WALTER A. McNEIL, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Mar 16, 2009

Citations

Case No. 3:07cv283/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Mar. 16, 2009)

Citing Cases

Herron v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr.

Petitioner did not raise these claims in his petition, did not seek leave to amend to add these claims, and…

Harter v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

Petitioner did not raise these claims in his petition, did not seek leave to amend his petition to add these…