From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Wright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1926
218 App. Div. 743 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

Opinion

October, 1926.


Order denying motion for judgment dismissing complaint because the cause of action is barred by the Statute of Limitations affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. While we consider the action as one brought for damages for criminal conversation, and that the two-year Statute of Limitation applies, we are of opinion that plaintiff was within her rights in selecting two years of a continuous cohabitation as a basis for maintaining her action. Kelly, P.J., Jaycox, Manning, Young and Lazansky, JJ., concur.

See Civ. Prac. Act, § 50. — [REP.


Summaries of

Clark v. Wright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1926
218 App. Div. 743 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)
Case details for

Clark v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:ESTELLE M. CLARK, Respondent, v. BEE WRIGHT, Also Known as BEE WRIGHT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1926

Citations

218 App. Div. 743 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)