From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jul 1, 2016
194 So. 3d 577 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 2D15–3254.

07-01-2016

Jerome CLARK, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Timothy J. Ferreri, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Jerome Clark, Jr., pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee.


Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Timothy J. Ferreri, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Jerome Clark, Jr., pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, we affirm Jerome Clark's judgments and sentences, but we remand to correct a scrivener's error in the judgment. Count four of the information charged Mr. Clark with possession of cocaine, and he entered a guilty plea to possession of cocaine. However, the judgment incorrectly states that count four is possession of alprazolam. This error has no impact on Mr. Clark's sentences, and his sentences constitute legal sentences. As such, we remand this matter to the trial court with instructions to correct count four of the judgment to reflect the correct conviction.

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and KELLY, JJ., concur.

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).


Summaries of

Clark v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jul 1, 2016
194 So. 3d 577 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Clark v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jerome CLARK, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Jul 1, 2016

Citations

194 So. 3d 577 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)