From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Britt

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 17, 2021
No. 21-6832 (4th Cir. Dec. 17, 2021)

Opinion

21-6832

12-17-2021

JOSEPH EARL CLARK, II, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SHAWN LINDSEY BRITT; MONICA ROSE ALMODOVAR; KATY POOLE; PAMELA J. LOCKLEAR; RONALD COVINGTON; DEAN LOCKLEAR; TOYA COLLINS; JUSTIN CHAVIS; JAMIE HAMMONDS; QUEEN E. GERALD; ZERRANTI MCLEAN; SELENA BARTEE; REGINALD MEWBORN; ELIZABETH D. WALLACE, Defendants - Appellees.

Joseph Earl Clark, II, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: December 16, 2021

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00493-CCE-JEP)

Joseph Earl Clark, II, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Joseph Earl Clark, II, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, denying in part relief on Clark's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, and granting default judgment in favor of Clark against one Defendant on one of Clark's claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Clark v. Britt

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 17, 2021
No. 21-6832 (4th Cir. Dec. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Clark v. Britt

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH EARL CLARK, II, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SHAWN LINDSEY BRITT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 17, 2021

Citations

No. 21-6832 (4th Cir. Dec. 17, 2021)

Citing Cases

Sorensson v. Dollar Gen. Corp.

Here, plaintiff appears to find fault in matters surrounding a criminal prosecution, not a civil matter. See…