Opinion
NO. 14-14-00741-CV
11-13-2014
CHRISTOPHER SPATES AND PRODIGY SERVICES, Appellants v. ENI US OPERATING COMPANY, Appellee
On Appeal from the 234th District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2012-35849
ORDER
This is an appeal from a judgment signed July 28, 2014. The notice of appeal was due August 27, 2014. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant, however, filed his notice of appeal on September 11, 2014, a date within 15 days of the due date for the notice of appeal. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when the perfecting instrument is filed within fifteen days of its due date. Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal in this court. While an extension may be implied, appellant is still obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd., 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.CHouston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.).
There is a motion contained in the clerk's record.
Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal on or before 10 days after the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3;10.5(b). If appellant does not comply with this order, we will dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.
PER CURIAM