From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Christiansen v. Wilkerson

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jan 12, 2006
No. 02-05-246-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 12, 2006)

Opinion

No. 02-05-246-CV

Delivered: January 12, 2006.

Appeal from the County Court of Cooke County.

Panel D: DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


On November 30, 2005, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a). See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

Christiansen v. Wilkerson

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jan 12, 2006
No. 02-05-246-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 12, 2006)
Case details for

Christiansen v. Wilkerson

Case Details

Full title:PETE CHRISTIANSEN, Appellant, v. BOBBY W. WILKERSON, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Jan 12, 2006

Citations

No. 02-05-246-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 12, 2006)