From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chism v. Kallas

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 19, 2008
291 F. App'x 65 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-35193.

Submitted August 11, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed August 19, 2008.

William Chism, Austin, TX, pro se.

Sara J. Olson, Office of the Washington Attorney General, Olympia, WA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Ricardo S. Martinez, District Judge, Presiding. RSM. D.C. No. 2:07-cv-0143-RSM.

Before: CANBY, LEAVY and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

A review of the record, appellant's response to this court's order to show cause, and the parties' briefs, indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Chism v. Kallas

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 19, 2008
291 F. App'x 65 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Chism v. Kallas

Case Details

Full title:William CHISM, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paris KALLAS, in her…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 19, 2008

Citations

291 F. App'x 65 (9th Cir. 2008)