From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chang Xing Chen v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Dec 2, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-11402-JGD (D. Mass. Dec. 2, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-11402-JGD

12-02-2016

CHANG XING CHEN, Plaintiff, v. JEH JOHNSON, Secretary of Dept. of Homeland Security, and LEON RODRIGUEZ, Director of U.S. Citizenship & Immigration, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

The plaintiff, Chang Xing Chen, brought this action challenging the failure of the United States Citizens and Immigration Services ("USCIS") to have made a final decision on his I-485 Adjustment of Status application. In response, on August 18, 2016, USCIS issued a Notice of Intent to Terminate asylum status, and granted the plaintiff an interview on October 18, 2016. Following the interview, USCIS terminated the plaintiff's asylum status on October 20, 2016, and issued a final Notice of Termination on October 26, 2016.

The parties consented to having this case finally resolved by a Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Rule 73(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Docket No. 8). --------

On November 8, 2016, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that the case is moot. (Docket No. 11). Although the plaintiff is represented by counsel, no opposition to the motion to dismiss was filed.

For the reasons detailed more fully in the "Defendants' Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Mootness" (Docket No. 12), the motion to dismiss is ALLOWED. "Mootness is a jurisdictional matter." Matt v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., 783 F.3d 368, 372 (1st Cir. 2015). "A case becomes moot - and therefore no longer a 'Case' or 'Controversy' for purposes of Article III - when the issues presented are no longer 'live' or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome." Id. (quoting Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc., 133 S. Ct. 721, 726 (2013) (per curiam) (additional citation omitted)). Where, as here, a case is moot, "dismissal of the action is compulsory." Overseas Military Sales Corp. v. Giralt-Armada, 503 F.3d 12, 17 (1st Cir. 2007) (internal quotations omitted). Since there is no longer a case or controversy for this court to decide, the case is dismissed as moot. Steffel v. Thompson, 415 U.S. 452, 459 n.10 (1974) ("The rule in federal cases is that an actual controversy must be extant at all stages of review, not merely at the time the complaint is filed.").

SO ORDERED.

/ s / Judith Gail Dein

Judith Gail Dein

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Chang Xing Chen v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Dec 2, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-11402-JGD (D. Mass. Dec. 2, 2016)
Case details for

Chang Xing Chen v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:CHANG XING CHEN, Plaintiff, v. JEH JOHNSON, Secretary of Dept. of Homeland…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Date published: Dec 2, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-11402-JGD (D. Mass. Dec. 2, 2016)

Citing Cases

Goncalves v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs.

Accordingly, all claims raised by the complaint appear to be moot. See, e.g., Sisse v. Moniz, 388 F.Supp.3d…