From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chemical Residential Mtg. v. Rector

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 7, 1998
742 So. 2d 300 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Summary

finding that complaint properly stated cause of action for foreclosure by the holder of the note and mortgage

Summary of this case from Philogene v. ABN Amro Mortgage Group Inc.

Opinion

Nos. 97-4380 and 98-432.

Opinion Filed October 7, 1998.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County, Judge Karen K. Cole.

Roger D. Bear of Roger D. Bear, P.A, Orlando, and Shawn G. Rader of Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor Reed, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

Fred Tromberg and Deborah L. Greene of Tromberg Safer, Jacksonville, for Appellees Terry Rector and Patricia Rector.


In this appeal from several orders entered in a mortgage foreclosure action, we find that the trial court erred as a matter of law in its order of June 30, 1997, in which it denied the appellant/mortgagor's April 23, 1997, motion to amend the final judgment of foreclosure and reset the sale date, vacated the April 7, 1995, final judgment of foreclosure, and vacated the August 5, 1996, order amending the final judgment. We find that the complaint properly stated a cause of action for foreclosure by the holder of the note and mortgage. When they did not timely respond to the complaint, the appellees/mortgagees waived any denial of its allegations that the appellant was the owner and holder of the note and mortgage and that the appellees had defaulted on the note and mortgage. Because the lien follows the debt, there was no requirement of attachment of a written and recorded assignment of the mortgage in order for the appellant to maintain the foreclosure action.

See, Warren v. Seminole Bond Mortgage Co., 172 So. 696 (Fla. 1937); Johns v. Gilliam, 184 So. 140 (Fla. 1938);American Central Ins. Co. v. Whitlock, 165 So. 380 (Fla. 1936);Collins v. W.C. Briggs, Inc., 123 So. 833 (Fla. 1929); Drake Lumber Co. v. Semple, 130 So. 577 (Fla. 1930).

The June 30, 1997, order is REVERSED. The appellees' motion for appellate attorney fees is DENIED. The appellant is entitled to appellate attorney fees. This case is REMANDED to the trial court, which shall reinstate the April 7, 1995, final judgment of foreclosure, vacate its order of June 30, 1997, and all subsequent orders, reconsider the appellant's motion to amend the final judgment of foreclosure and set a new sale date, and determine a reasonable appellate attorney fee.

DAVIS, J. and SHIVERS, DOUGLASS B., Senior Judge, Concur.


Summaries of

Chemical Residential Mtg. v. Rector

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 7, 1998
742 So. 2d 300 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

finding that complaint properly stated cause of action for foreclosure by the holder of the note and mortgage

Summary of this case from Philogene v. ABN Amro Mortgage Group Inc.
Case details for

Chemical Residential Mtg. v. Rector

Case Details

Full title:CHEMICAL RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE, formerly known as Margaretten Company…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Oct 7, 1998

Citations

742 So. 2d 300 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

US Bank, NA v. Glicken

See Gorel v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 165 So.3d 44, 46 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) ; see also Jelic v. BAC Home Loans…

Taylor v. Bayview Loan Servicing

The First District Court of Appeal has cited Johns and other cases in support of the following proposition:…