From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chein v. Shumsky

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 19, 2003
No. 01-56320 (9th Cir. Aug. 19, 2003)

Opinion


EDMUND Y. CHEIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. RICHARD SHUMSKY, Chief Probation Officer LA County; CALIFORNIA STATE ATTORNEY, GENERAL, Respondents-Appellees. No. 01-56320 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit August 19, 2003

D.C. No.CV-99-05296-ABC.

ORDER

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Judge Fisher was recused.


Summaries of

Chein v. Shumsky

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 19, 2003
No. 01-56320 (9th Cir. Aug. 19, 2003)
Case details for

Chein v. Shumsky

Case Details

Full title:EDMUND Y. CHEIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. RICHARD SHUMSKY, Chief Probation…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 19, 2003

Citations

No. 01-56320 (9th Cir. Aug. 19, 2003)