From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chein v. Shumsky

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 13, 2003
340 F.3d 786 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion

No. 01-56320.

August 13, 2003.

Charles M. Sevilla, Esq., Law Office, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Brentford Ferriera, Matthew G. Monforton, Esq., District Attorney-Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Cliff Gardner, Esq., San Francisco, CA, for Amicus.


ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Judge Fisher was recused.


Summaries of

Chein v. Shumsky

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 13, 2003
340 F.3d 786 (9th Cir. 2003)
Case details for

Chein v. Shumsky

Case Details

Full title:Edmund Y. CHEIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Richard SHUMSKY, Chief Probation…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 13, 2003

Citations

340 F.3d 786 (9th Cir. 2003)