From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chavez v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan 31, 2019
168 A.D.3d 1332 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

526846

01-31-2019

In the Matter of Ivan CHAVEZ, Petitioner, v. Anythony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Ivan Chavez, Elmira, petitioner pro se. Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Ivan Chavez, Elmira, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Garry, P.J., Lynch, Mulvey, Aarons and Pritzker, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENTProceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III prison disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record, and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. The record establishes that the penalty imposed included loss of good time, and, although not referenced in the Attorney General's letter, we note that the loss of five months of good time incurred by petitioner as a result of the determination should be restored (see Matter of Dallas v. Annucci, 160 A.D.3d 1325, 1325, 72 N.Y.S.3d 501 [2018] ; Matter of Harrison v. Annucci, 159 A.D.3d 1255, 1256 [2018] ). Given that petitioner has received the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Brown v. Fischer, 148 A.D.3d 1383, 1384, 48 N.Y.S.3d 635 [2017] ). As the record reflects that petitioner had paid a reduced filing fee of $50 and he has requested reimbursement thereof, we grant petitioner's request for that amount.

Garry, P.J., Lynch, Mulvey, Aarons and Pritzker, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $50.


Summaries of

Chavez v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan 31, 2019
168 A.D.3d 1332 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Chavez v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of IVAN CHAVEZ, Petitioner, v. ANYTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 31, 2019

Citations

168 A.D.3d 1332 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
90 N.Y.S.3d 917
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 654

Citing Cases

Telesford v. Annucci

As the letter indicates that petitioner has yet to be refunded the mandatory $5 surcharge (see 7 NYCRR 253.7…

Small v. State

To the extent that petitioner seeks to be restored to the status that he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary…