From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chaline Estates, Inc. v. Furcraft Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 21, 2000
278 A.D.2d 141 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

December 21, 2000.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered July 26, 2000, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by defendants' brief, in an action seeking, inter alia, dissolution of a partnership and an accounting, granted plaintiff's motion for appointment of a temporary receiver of the partnership's real property, and denied defendants' motion to dismiss the first and third causes of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

David J. Nathan, for plaintiff-respondent.

Mark J. Alonso, for defendants-appellants.

Before: Sullivan, P.J., Wallach, Lerner, Andrias, Buckley, JJ.


The motion court correctly granted plaintiff's motion for appointment of a temporary receiver of the real property owned by defendant partnership, in which plaintiff holds a 20% interest and the other defendants collectively hold an 80% interest, based on the fact, admitted by defendants, that the managing partners had purported to cause the partnership to transfer such real property to defendant limited liability company, a newly created entity, without any prior notice to plaintiff. Such undisputed unlawful disposition of partnership property, regardless of the subsequent notice to plaintiff inviting it to acquire a substitute interest in the transferee entity, manifests a predisposition to take unilateral action in disregard of plaintiff's rights, thereby demonstrating a danger of material injury to the property within the meaning of CPLR 6401(a) (see, Butler v. Gibbons, 225 A.D.2d 335; Wong v. Wong, 161 A.D.2d 710, 711; Johnson, Matthey Co. v. Permadent Mfg. Corp., 16 A.D.2d 750, affd 12 N.Y.2d 747). The motion court also correctly denied the motion to dismiss the accounting cause of action, since defendants' purported offer to provide a voluntary accounting only to a minority shareholder of plaintiff, and without providing access to the partnership's books and records, was illusory. Under these circumstances, we also perceive no error in the denial of the motion to dismiss the cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty and waste.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Chaline Estates, Inc. v. Furcraft Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 21, 2000
278 A.D.2d 141 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Chaline Estates, Inc. v. Furcraft Associates

Case Details

Full title:CHALINE ESTATES, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. FURCRAFT ASSOCIATES, ET…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 21, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 141 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
718 N.Y.S.2d 53

Citing Cases

Trs. of Masonic Hall & Asylum Fund v. Bay Ridge Lodge 758 Bldg. Corp.

Defendants further state that the Trustees are in possession of the monthly Profit and Loss reports of the…

Singh v. Brunswick Hospital Center, Inc.

In this case, the documentary evidence sufficiently established that the plaintiffs have an "apparent…