Summary
holding that the administrative appeals unit was not bound by prior rulings of the service centers based on the same mistaken approvals as in the applications at hand
Summary of this case from Hakimuddin v. Department of Homeland SecurityOpinion
OCTOBER 1, 2001
No. 00-1799 TURNER v. BENEFICIAL CORP. ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 242 F.3d 1023.
No. 00-1800 KIA P., INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF MORA P., AN INFANT v. CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 235 F.3d 749.
No. 00-1801 WEIR ET UX. v. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD. App. Ct. Ill., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: ___ Ill. App.3d ___, ___, N.E.2d ___.
No. 00-1802 BARNAUD v. BELLE FOURCHE IRRIGATION DISTRICT ET AL. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 235 F.3d 1139.
No. 00-1803 BROWN v. KNOX COUNTY ET AL. Ct. App. Tenn. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 39 S.W.3d 585.
No. 00-1804 McDONALD v. WASHINGTON. Ct. App. Wash. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 100 Wash.App. 828, 1 P.3d 1176 and 12 P.3d 649.
No. 00-1806 STANLEY WORKS v. CHRISTOPHER. C.A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 240 F.3d 95.
No. 00-1807 CLANCY v. EMPLOYERS HEALTH INSURANCE CO. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 248 F.3d 1142.
No. 00-1808 KNIGHT v. MALENG ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 2 Fed. Appx. 833.
No. 00-1809 KUNGLE v. INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES, INC., ET AL. Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 134 Md. App. 710.
No. 00-1810 JEFFERSON v. CAPTAIN D'S RESTAURANT, AKA SHONEY'S INC., ET AL. Ct. App. Tenn. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-1811 PIOTROWSKI v. CITY OF HOUSTON. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 237 F.3d 567.
No. 00-1814 AROYO-GONZALEZ ET AL. v. COAHOMA CHEMICAL CO. ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 248 F.3d 1138.