From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Nov 27, 2000
531 U.S. 1013 (2000)

Summary

noting that, "by themselves, reputational interests are not 'liberty' interests within the meaning of the Due Process Clause and do not merit due process protections"

Summary of this case from Meyer v. State

Opinion

NOVEMBER 27, 2000


00-477 RANGEL VELAZQUEZ ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 216 F.3d 1089.

00-481 BATES v. TEXAS. Ct. App. Tex., 6th Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 15 S.W.3d 155.

00-488 MUSIC SQUARE CHURCH v. UNITED STATES C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 218 F.3d 1367.

00-495 ALDERETTE v. ROE, WARDEN. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-501 LITWAK v. OSCAR PRODUCTIONS, INC., ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 217 F.3d 845.

00-503 JATOI v. GUARANTY FEDERAL BANK, F. S. B. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 216 F.3d 1080.

00-508 LINCOLN LOAN CO. v. CITY OF PORTLAND ET AL. Ct. App. Ore. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 158 Or. App. 574, 976 P.2d 60.

00-510 SMITH v. OREGON STATE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ET AL. Sup.Ct. Ore. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 330 Or. 227, 998 P.2d 675.

00-518 BICKFORD ET AL. v. ANCHORAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 229 F.3d 1157.

00-532 GRIGSON v. CREATIVE ARTISTS AGENCY ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 210 F.3d 524.

00-533 HUBERTY v. SOETEBER ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 221 F.3d 1348.

00-536 HOLBROOK v. LOBDELL-EMERY MANUFACTURING CO. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 219 F.3d 598.

00-541 PERKIN-ELMER CORP. v. TA INSTRUMENTS, INC. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-552 GARDNER v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD. C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 323 F.3d 913.

00-564 THOMAS ET AL. v. DICKEL ET AL. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 213 F.3d 1023.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Nov 27, 2000
531 U.S. 1013 (2000)

noting that, "by themselves, reputational interests are not 'liberty' interests within the meaning of the Due Process Clause and do not merit due process protections"

Summary of this case from Meyer v. State
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 27, 2000

Citations

531 U.S. 1013 (2000)

Citing Cases

Z.A. v. Oswald

"[F]ederal courts should exercise judicial restraint and avoid state law issues wherever possible." Thomas v.…

Yochum v. Lake Country Power

However, the absence of an actionable federal claim effectively precludes the Court from exercising…