From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 2, 2000
531 U.S. 849 (2000)

Summary

holding state court fact findings are presumed correct and the petitioner has the burden of rebutting the presumption by clear and convincing evidence

Summary of this case from BERRY v. EPPS

Opinion

OCTOBER 2, 2000


99-9880 BELL v. VALDEZ, JUDGE, ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 207 F.3d 657.

99-9881 WHITAKER v. MARYLAND. Ct. App. Md. Certiorari denied.

99-9882 WILSON v. MILLER, SUPERINTENDENT, EASTERN NEW YORK CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

99-9885 TAYLOR v. TUCKER ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 208 F.3d 1007.

99-9887 CHAN v. PATAKI, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK, ET AL. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 208 F.3d 1007.

99-9891 MILLER v. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 200 F.3d 274.

99-9892 BARAJAS-MONTIEL v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 185 F.3d 947.

99-9893 MELTON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

99-9895 MITCHELL v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 209 F.3d 319.

99-9896 NORRIS v. UNITED STATES. C.A.D.C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

99-9897 SPEARMAN v. ATLAS, JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 210 F.3d 368.

99-9898 REGISTER v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 182 F.3d 820.

99-9899 OUTTEN v. RICE, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

99-9900 CARROLL v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 2, 2000
531 U.S. 849 (2000)

holding state court fact findings are presumed correct and the petitioner has the burden of rebutting the presumption by clear and convincing evidence

Summary of this case from BERRY v. EPPS

holding Mills inapplicable to a Texas capital sentencing proceeding

Summary of this case from Prieto v. Dretke

holding Mills inapplicable to a Texas capital sentencing proceeding

Summary of this case from Amador v. Dretke

holding state court fact findings are presumed correct, and the Petitioner has the burden of rebutting the presumption by clear and convincing evidence

Summary of this case from Amador v. Dretke

holding state court fact findings are presumed correct and the petitioner has the burden of rebutting the presumption by clear and convincing evidence

Summary of this case from Cockrell v. Cockrell
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 2, 2000

Citations

531 U.S. 849 (2000)

Citing Cases

Hinojosa v. Dretke

SeeFoster v. Johnson, 293 F.3d 766, 776 (5th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1054 (2002); Rudd v. Johnson,…

Cupples v. Cockrell

"In the context of federal habeas proceedings, a resolution (or adjudication) on the merits is a term of art…