From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ceravolo v. Sunnyside Market

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 1990
168 A.D.2d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

December 3, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The third-party defendant, Borden, Inc. (hereinafter Borden), asserts that, upon their motion to have the complaint in the main action restored to the Trial Calendar, the plaintiffs failed to make a sufficient showing of the merits of their claims and that the complaint should have been dismissed. We disagree. Upon an examination of the complaint and a review of the affidavit of merit submitted by the plaintiff Michael Ceravolo, we cannot conclude that there is no merit to the plaintiffs' action under any of the theories set forth in the complaint. Accordingly, we find that the Supreme Court properly declined to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3404 and properly restored the action to the Trial Calendar. Thompson, J.P., Brown, Balletta, Miller and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ceravolo v. Sunnyside Market

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 1990
168 A.D.2d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Ceravolo v. Sunnyside Market

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL CERAVOLO et al., Respondents, v. SUNNYSIDE MARKET, Defendant and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 3, 1990

Citations

168 A.D.2d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Citing Cases

Hatcher v. Cassanova

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. It is well settled that a motion to…